How Should Required Minimum Distributions Affect Social Security Timing?

Ross Marino |

You are in your 60s, Social Security is available, and a substantial traditional IRA or 401(k) is still growing. Claiming now would reduce the amount you need from investments. Waiting could increase the monthly benefit, yet it may also leave Social Security arriving closer to future required minimum distributions.

That can look like a collision: delay one income source now, then receive two taxable income streams later. The collision is real enough to model, but it does not make either early claiming or aggressive tax moves automatically right. The decision is how these sources should enter the household plan over time.

Why do future RMDs belong in a Social Security decision?

RMDs create a future floor under withdrawals from many pretax retirement accounts. Under current law, the applicable starting age is generally 73 for people born from 1951 through 1959 and 75 for people born in 1960 or later. Traditional IRAs and many employer plans are subject to the rules, while an original owner generally has no lifetime RMD from a Roth IRA.[1]

An RMD is generally included in taxable income except for basis or another tax-free portion. It does not reduce the Social Security payment itself. Instead, it joins the tax calculation around that payment. Federal taxation of Social Security uses “combined income,” generally adjusted gross income plus tax-exempt interest and one-half of Social Security benefits. Depending on filing status and income, up to 85% of benefits may be taxable.[2]

The gross benefit can remain unchanged while more of it becomes taxable. Avoiding that taxation at all costs is not the objective; a stronger after-tax plan may reasonably include taxable benefits.

What changes when you delay Social Security?

Claiming before full retirement age generally produces a permanently lower monthly retirement benefit. Waiting beyond full retirement age can increase it until age 70; there is no additional retirement-benefit increase for delaying past 70.[3] That larger payment can strengthen the household income floor and may matter for a surviving spouse.

Delay also creates a funding job. Spending must come from cash, investments, retirement accounts, work, or another source. Pretax spending can reduce later RMD exposure, but creates taxable income now and removes assets from future growth.

Where does the planning window move?

Follow income as it moves from mostly chosen to increasingly scheduled.

Before Social Security

Controllable: gains, withdrawals, conversions.

Less controllable: pensions, interest, dividends.

Tax interaction: optional income sets the return.

Flexibility: widest.

Decision: how should spending be funded?

Social Security before RMDs

Controllable: gains, withdrawals, optional conversions.

Less controllable: benefits and recurring income.

Tax interaction: added income may expose more benefits.

Flexibility: narrower.

Decision: what optional income still belongs here?

Social Security plus RMDs

Controllable: added withdrawals, gains, Roth spending.

Less controllable: benefits, RMDs, pensions.

Tax interaction: income may concentrate.

Flexibility: required income enters first.

Decision: how should required cash support life?

The claiming date moves the middle period—and changes how long the first remains available.

How can the available years be used without forcing a tax strategy?

One path is to claim Social Security earlier and use fewer investment withdrawals now. Another is to delay benefits while taking measured pretax withdrawals for spending. A third is to delay and convert part of an eligible pretax balance to Roth. A conversion generally creates current taxable income in exchange for moving assets toward potential qualified tax-free withdrawals and away from the original owner’s future RMD calculation.[4]

None wins in isolation. Earlier pretax withdrawals can reduce future RMDs but may accelerate tax. Leaving the account untouched preserves invested capital yet may build a larger required-income stream. Compare future rates, returns, the source of conversion tax, liquidity, and the investment horizon.[5] [6]

Dovetail Principle: Financial Decisions Need to Fit Together

Social Security timing, portfolio withdrawals, Roth conversions, and future RMDs are not separate optimization contests. Each changes the income, liquidity, and flexibility available to the others. A useful plan asks whether the sequence works as a household system.

What should the household compare across the full sequence?

Begin with after-tax spending across the years before benefits, after benefits begin, and after RMDs begin. Test how claiming dates change withdrawals, account balances, and dependable income. If Medicare applies, include income-related premium adjustments proportionately; they generally use tax information from two years earlier.[7]

For couples, carry the projection into either survivor’s life. One Social Security payment usually ends after the first death, while pretax assets and RMD exposure may remain. The survivor may eventually file as single with less tax capacity. That can make the higher earner’s larger delayed benefit valuable even when later taxes are higher.[8]

State income taxes may change the comparison, but they should not dominate without a state-specific calculation. The same is true for investment assumptions and case-specific Social Security rules. Coordinate the projection with the financial planner, have the tax professional test the tax returns and conversion amounts, and use Social Security resources or qualified counsel when eligibility or benefit details are uncertain.

Where should the decision land?

Choose the claiming date only after mapping the household’s income sources across several years. The strongest sequence is not necessarily the one with the smallest RMD, the lowest lifetime tax estimate, or the largest Social Security check. It is the one that reliably funds life now, manages later income concentration, preserves enough accessible money, and strengthens the household’s lifetime income floor.

Future RMDs should influence Social Security timing because they change the environment in which benefits will arrive. They should not dictate it. The decision belongs inside one coordinated withdrawal, tax, investment, and survivor-income plan.

Related Reading: Reviewing Choices Before RMDs Begin explains what remains adjustable before required withdrawals begin.

About the author

Ross Marino, CFP®, CeFT®, is the Founder & CEO of Dovetail Financial and creator of Human-First Financial Guidance®. He helps people nearing or living in retirement connect their lives and wealth so that financial decisions become clearer, more personal, and easier to navigate.

Search another retirement question

Describe the question or enter a few topic words. You do not need to know the exact article title.

 

Notes

  1. Retirement topics – Required minimum distributions (RMDs), Internal Revenue Service.
  2. Taxes on Social Security Are Based on Your Income, AARP.
  3. Benefits Planner: Retirement Age and Benefit Reduction, Social Security Administration.
  4. Answers to Roth Conversion Questions, Fidelity Investments.
  5. Required Minimum Distributions: What’s New in 2026, Charles Schwab.
  6. The Arithmetic of Roth Conversions, Journal of Financial Planning.
  7. 2026 Medicare Parts A & B Premiums and Deductibles, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
  8. The Widow Tax, Stanford Center on Longevity.

Disclosure

This content is provided by Dovetail Financial Group LLC (“Dovetail Financial”) for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended as, and should not be construed as, individualized investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice; a recommendation to buy or sell any security; or a recommendation to adopt any investment strategy. Because each person’s situation is unique, readers should consult their own financial, tax, and legal professionals before taking action based on this content. Information contained herein is believed to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. Any opinions expressed are current as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. All investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Asset allocation and diversification do not guarantee profits or protect against losses in declining markets. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Dovetail Financial Group LLC is a registered investment adviser. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Additional information about Dovetail Financial Group LLC, including Form ADV Part 2A and Form CRS, is available at adviserinfo.sec.gov. © 2026 Dovetail Financial Group LLC. All rights reserved.