Spend, Give, or Leave More: How Do You Decide What Wealth Is For?
A meaningful trip, a request from family, and a charitable opportunity can all arrive in the same season. An estate review may raise a different question about what should eventually pass to others.
Each use may matter. The harder question is how your wealth should serve your life now and support people or causes during your lifetime. A related question is what you want to provide later without closing off choices you may still need.
This is not simply a spending decision or an estate-planning decision. It is a decision about what the wealth is for.
Why can a large balance leave the purpose unclear?
A portfolio value can show what you have. It does not show how much is meant for your current life, how much you want to use for others, or how much should remain flexible.
Research helps explain why that distinction matters. In a 2024 survey, 38% of retirees described themselves as having a savings mindset, while 36% reported an unexpected need to spend after retirement. [1] A review of retirement-saving research found that uncertain longevity and medical costs can be reasons older households hold wealth. A desire to leave bequests and the value of remaining in their homes can matter too. [2]
Those motives can overlap. Money left untouched may be preserving future choice, expressing a legacy goal, or simply waiting because its job has never been named.
What are the three broad uses of wealth?
One way to begin is to separate three broad uses.
- Spend for life now. This can include everyday comfort, travel, time with family, a change at home, or support that makes daily life easier.
- Give or support during life. This may mean helping family through a defined need or supporting charitable work while you can see the effect.
- Leave for later. This can provide for a spouse, family, friends, or charities after death.
The three uses do not need equal shares. They do need to be visible together because being more committed to one purpose usually means being less immediately available for another.
Timing matters too. A study of U.S. households found that real spending generally declined after age 65, while the share devoted to gifts and donations increased with age. The pattern describes what happened across the study population. It does not prescribe when any one household should spend or give. [3]
What does each choice protect?
Spending now can protect time-sensitive experiences, health, comfort, or connection. The trade-off is that the money is no longer available for later needs or transfers.
Giving now can let support arrive when it may be most useful. It may also allow you to participate in the effect. The tradeoff is a loss of control once the gift is complete, along with the possibility that one-time help becomes an expected pattern.
Leaving more later preserves control and flexibility during life. It can support family or charity in the future, but it may postpone the benefit and leave fewer opportunities to see how the transfer is used. Charitable support can occur during life or through a bequest. Giving USA reported that individual gifts and bequests were both material sources of U.S. charitable giving in 2025. [4] The National Council of Nonprofits notes that charitable legacy gifts may be arranged through a will, retirement account, life insurance policy, or another asset. [5]
The method comes after the purpose. A tax-efficient technique is not automatically the right choice if it commits money sooner than intended or assigns it to the wrong job.
How much flexibility should remain?
Flexibility is not a fourth destination for the money. It is the part of the plan that keeps the three uses reviewable.
Start by identifying what should remain available for your own income, housing, health, and unexpected costs. Then test proposed spending, lifetime gifts, and legacy goals against that amount. The answer may be a range rather than a single fixed number.
Legacy expectations can change when circumstances change. Research using Health and Retirement Study data found that wealth losses during the Great Recession were associated with lower bequest expectations, while later wealth gains did not produce a simple mirror-image increase. [6] That does not mean legacy is unimportant. It shows why a legacy amount should be reviewed rather than treated as fixed, regardless of what happens.
Dovetail Principle: Living Now and Protecting Later Both Belong in the Decision
Living now becomes concrete when you name the experiences, support, or giving that you want your wealth to make possible. Protecting later becomes concrete when you identify the income, care, housing, and flexibility that should remain available.
The principle is not a promise that every goal can be fully funded. It is a way to keep present use and future protection in the same decision before one quietly crowds out the other.
What should a wealth-purpose review include?
A useful review can begin with five questions:
- What do we want our wealth to make possible during the next few years?
- Who or what do we want to support while we are living?
- What should remain available if health, housing, markets, or family needs change?
- What would we still want to leave if retirement unfolds differently than expected?
- Which decisions are permanent, and which can be reviewed later?
The result is not one perfect allocation. It is a clearer view of what each choice protects, what it uses, and what remains adjustable.
For help naming the purpose behind a charitable decision, see Before You Give, Name the Question.
Related Reading: What Can We Actually Spend in Retirement? This companion article shows how to test present spending against what should remain available.
About the author
Ross Marino, CFP®, CeFT®, is the Founder & CEO of Dovetail Financial and creator of Human-First Financial Guidance®. He helps people nearing or living in retirement connect their lives and wealth so that financial decisions become clearer, more personal, and easier to navigate.
Notes
- 2024 Spending in Retirement Study Uncovers Concerning Trends on Dampened Spending Expectations Due to Lack of Sufficient Savings, Inflationary Pressures and Rising Credit Card Debt, Employee Benefit Research Institute, November 13, 2024.
- Savings After Retirement, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, December 13, 2022.
- Spending trajectories after age 65 variation by initial wealth, The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, October 2023.
- Giving USA: U.S. Charitable Giving Rose to $617.20 Billion in 2025, Surpassing the $600 Billion Mark for the First Time, Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, June 23, 2026.
- Download the Guide to Legacy Giving, National Council of Nonprofits.
- A Lasting Legacy of the Great Recession, Journal of Financial Planning, February 2022.
Disclosure
This content is provided by Dovetail Financial Group LLC (“Dovetail Financial”) for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended as, and should not be construed as, individualized investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice; a recommendation to buy or sell any security; or a recommendation to adopt any investment strategy. Because each person’s situation is unique, readers should consult their own financial, tax, and legal professionals before taking action based on this content. Information contained herein is believed to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. Any opinions expressed are current as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. All investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Asset allocation and diversification do not guarantee profits or protect against losses in declining markets. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Dovetail Financial Group LLC is a registered investment adviser. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Additional information about Dovetail Financial Group LLC, including Form ADV Part 2A and Form CRS, is available at adviserinfo.sec.gov. © 2026 Dovetail Financial Group LLC. All rights reserved.
