Should You Take an IRA Withdrawal in December or January for a Large Expense?

Ross Marino |

A home project is scheduled for January. You have decided it belongs in your retirement plan, and part of the payment will come from your traditional IRA. Taking the money in December would have it ready early. Waiting until January would put the withdrawal into another tax year.

That short interval creates a real choice. Compare December, January, and a split across both years while keeping the purchase and its payment deadline unchanged. The best schedule needs to work for your cash as well as your taxes.

What changes when the withdrawal crosses December 31?

The taxable portion of a traditional IRA distribution generally belongs to the year you receive it. Paying the contractor later does not move that income into the payment year. If your IRA includes after-tax contributions, confirm the taxable portion rather than assuming every dollar is taxable.[1]

For someone age 59½ or older using their own IRA, the central comparison is which year should absorb the optional income. Early withdrawals and inherited accounts follow different rules and require a different review.

Which year has more room for the added income?

Start with what each year already contains. Your final working year might include salary and a bonus. The next year might have less earned income but more pension income, planned withdrawals, or a proposed Roth conversion. January is a new tax year, not automatically a lower-cost year.

Have your advisor and tax professional compare the added cost of each schedule against both complete annual projections. Research on retirement withdrawals shows why the tax on additional income can differ from the printed tax bracket when other tax and benefit rules interact.[2]

For Medicare beneficiaries, higher income can also increase Part B and Part D premiums, generally using a return from two years earlier.[3] Splitting a withdrawal could reduce a surcharge, leave it unchanged, or affect two premium years instead of one. Compare the combined effect using the applicable thresholds when available; future amounts remain uncertain.

If the January transfer arrives late

Cash ready

Cash at risk

December withdrawal

All bill cash.
Income falls this year.

None depends on a January transfer.

January withdrawal

None from this IRA.

The full bill amount.
Income falls next year.

Split withdrawal

Only this year’s part.
Income spans both years.

The rest of the bill still depends on January.

Cash ready means bank-ready by December 31. Assumes the January transfer misses the bill’s due date and no other cash bridges the gap. Compare the same net purchase cash; tax funding is additional.

Does a split actually leave you better off?

A split deserves testing when neither year should carry the whole withdrawal. It need not be fifty-fifty. The useful division follows the income and cash needs in each year, not a preference for equal amounts.

Keep the net amount available for the purchase constant. If withholding comes out of the IRA, the gross withdrawal must cover that withholding and the deposit. Money withheld still forms part of the distribution; it is a tax payment, not a reduction in taxable income.[1]

Then compare what remains after the purchase and its taxes. Research comparing withdrawal strategies illustrates that minimizing taxes alone does not necessarily preserve the most resources.[4] Here, a modest tax difference may not justify using emergency cash or making the payment deadline uncertain.

Dovetail Principle: Timing Can Change Which Options Remain

The January project and the IRA withdrawal do not have to share a calendar year. Reviewing the choice before December closes preserves the option to use either year deliberately. The purpose is to support the project without creating an avoidable cost or cash shortage.

What could limit the timing choice?

Separate required minimum distributions from the optional amount. An RMD due December 31 cannot wait merely because the purchase is in January. A first-year RMD may qualify for a later deadline, but that exception needs its own comparison. Taking more than required this year does not count toward next year’s RMD.[5]

Then work backward from the day the contractor needs payment. Most securities transactions settle on the next business day, but settlement is not the same as money arriving in your bank.[6] Confirm the custodian’s distribution cutoff and transfer time. Holidays can leave fewer working days than the calendar suggests.

If January timing would miss the deadline, use it only when existing cash can bridge the gap without weakening the reserve you want to protect. Otherwise, December or a partial December withdrawal may be the workable choice.

Settle on one schedule: how much cash must reach checking, what leaves the IRA in each year, how taxes will be funded, and when the money must arrive. Choose December, January, or a split because its combined cost and cash timing fit your life—not simply because deferring income sounds better.

If the funding source is still undecided, begin with How Should You Fund a Large One-Time Retirement Expense? before choosing the withdrawal year.

About the author

Ross Marino, CFP®, CeFT®, is the Founder & CEO of Dovetail Financial and creator of Human-First Financial Guidance®. He helps people nearing or living in retirement connect their lives and wealth so that financial decisions become clearer, more personal, and easier to navigate.

Search another retirement question

Describe the question or enter a few topic words. You do not need to know the exact article title.

 

Notes

  1. Publication 590-B (2025), Distributions from Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs). IRS.
  2. Tax-Efficient Withdrawal Strategies for Five Groups. Financial Planning Association. William Reichenstein and William Meyer, July 2022. Research used for the distinction between tax brackets and added-income costs; historical thresholds are not used.
  3. Premiums: Rules for Higher-Income Beneficiaries. SSA.
  4. Tax-Efficient Retirement Withdrawal Planning Using a Comprehensive Tax Model. Financial Planning Association. Alan R. Sumutka, Andrew M. Sumutka, and Lewis W. Coopersmith, April 2012. Research used to distinguish minimizing taxes from preserving resources; historical tax assumptions are not current rules.
  5. Required Minimum Distributions: Know Your Deadlines. FINRA.
  6. Understanding Settlement Cycles. FINRA.

Disclosure

This content is provided by Dovetail Financial Group LLC (“Dovetail Financial”) for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended as, and should not be construed as, individualized investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice; a recommendation to buy or sell any security; or a recommendation to adopt any investment strategy. Because each person’s situation is unique, readers should consult their own financial, tax, and legal professionals before taking action based on this content. Information contained herein is believed to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. Any opinions expressed are current as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. All investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Asset allocation and diversification do not guarantee profits or protect against losses in declining markets. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Dovetail Financial Group LLC is a registered investment adviser. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Additional information about Dovetail Financial Group LLC, including Form ADV Part 2A and Form CRS, is available at adviserinfo.sec.gov. © 2026 Dovetail Financial Group LLC. All rights reserved.